Friday, January 27, 2006
Al Gore's Oil interests threatened
Former U.S. vice-president Al Gore has accused the oil industry of financially backing the Tories and their "ultra-conservative leader" to protect its stake in Alberta's lucrative oilsands.
Gore warned that Harper wants to remove Canada from the Kyoto accord, which the United States signed under former president Bill Clinton, but has refused to ratify under President George W. Bush.
The treaty was laughed out of congress during Clinton's reign, and 'ol Bill only signed onto it as a favor for his whiney veep.
The real reason Gore is making these charges against conservatives is because it is threat to his own oil interests with Occidental Petroleum, of which Gore is a major share owner. Source article
Most fascinating is the historical connection between the Gore family and Occidental Petroleum, in which Gore holds about a quarter of a million dollars worth of stock in trust for his mother. The connection goes back to Gore’s father’s close relationship with the late Armand Hammer, Occidental’s founder and the son of Julius Hammer, the man who founded the U.S. Communist Party. For all of his life, Armand Hammer remained close to the murderous Joseph Stalin, his successors and the entire Soviet leadership during the Cold War.
(Former) Vice President Al Gore has a long-time relationship with Occidental Petroleum that has been enormously beneficial to the company. Occidental's late chairman, the controversial Armand Hammer, liked to say that he had Gore's father, Senator Albert Gore, Senior, quote, "in my back pocket", unquote. When the elder Gore left the Senate in 1970, Hammer hired him for $500,000 a year. Personally and professionally the vice president has profited from Occidental largess. To this day he still draws $20,000 a year from a land deal in Tennessee brokered between his father and Hammer. The total amount is more than $300,000.
So now we know why Gore is making these shrill accusations. It isn't about the environment at all, that's only his cover, it's really about his oil company interests getting heavy competition from Canada, which of course will hurt his bottom line, which is all he really cares about.
Despite his public reputation as a staunch environmentalist, Gore recommended that the president approve giving oil companies access to this publicly owned land. It is land that the U.S. Navy has held as emergency reserves since 1912. In October, 1997, the Energy Department announced that the government would sell 47,000 acres of the Elk Hills reserve to Occidental. Source article
The Real Al Gore on the Environment
Gore is typical of the liberals who profess one thing and do another. Doing the opposite while accusing your opponents of what you are guilty of, is the game plan of democrats. The problem they have is that we've seen this game played for years but had little recourse to stop them. All that has changed now with the new media replacing the old liberal media, allowing the truth to come out and exposing the massive hypocrisy and deceptions of the left against the American people. Source article
© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.
|
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
Oil, Nukes and War–Oh Boy!
With the ratcheting up of defiantly-reckless rhetoric by Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, America may have set itself up for diplomatic failure by second guessing intelligence on Iraq.
There seems to be a big storm headed our way as half the United States Congress doesn't trust the president or his administration because of negative publicity of not finding more WMD's that had previously been confirmed by many of our allies. Will not finding Saddam's stockpiles hamstring us into waiting too long like we did while Hitler was killing millions of inncent people?
America is beginning to be marginalized by Iran's declarations in their use of damaging headlines, provided free of charge by the liberal media against not only the president, but many in the administration as well, including the secretary of defense and vice president and their true target, Israel.
Will Democrat's join with Republican's to defend the nation in stopping Iran from achieving nuclear capabililty?
This could be an opening for democrat's to get away from the dovishness of liberals by taking an offensive posture on Iran while quieting their liberal base's anti-American rhetoric.
It is with sincere desire that the democrat's will stop playing their appeasement game and finally face up to their responsibilities as one of America's great political parties. They seem to have forgotten that 9/11 ever happened, likely because they know that it was caused by their president's lack of leadership in the years before that let terrorists' plan against us while the CIA and FBI was being separated by the wall put in place by Clinton appointee Jamie Gorelick, who also had a hand in the cover-up as part of the 9/11 commission.
Would Iran even be near this bold if the democrat's and the media supported the war in Iraq? To be sure, they would at least be more cautious about their approach instead of allowing their president to announce his obsession to destroy Israel.
The threat of Iran halting their oil production if sanctions are put in place by the UN security council has already pushed prices to recent highs and could send them upwards to $100 a barrrel, thus destableizing the world's economy.
China gets much of its oil from Iran and has billions in contracts with them, as does Russia, and both hold veto power at the UN. The west may have no choice but to accept Iran as a nuclear power which could leave Israel to its own defenses.
The problem for the left is that they need a 180º turn around for '06 to have any credible security platform. Dove's like John Kerry and Howard Dean cannot convince anyone they're pro military as they've consistently shied away from national defense by voting for the war and then going against it. They bash Bush as being a warmonger, but offer no alternatives except to cut and run like losers in a Vietnam redo. Their kind of wishy-washy whining is not leadership in any sense of the word. Democrat's should either join with Republicans offering solutions, follow, or get the hell out of the way!
Iraq was likely only the beginning of the administration's middle-east policy after 9/11. But now there's something else on the horizon that could doom America.
Iraninan Nazis?
China and Russia have agreed with the U.S. and Europe that Iran must suspend enrichment activities. But they have failed to recommend Iran be sent to the U.N. Security Council. Not that it would stop Iran or anything, but it would've shown seriousness. Now Iran can just keep up their work and defy the world to Israel's dismay.
The best America can hope for is that Iran is blowing smoke. But to take a chance on that might mean real disaster for the world.
An even scarier one would be for the left to try and outdo Bush on defense, thus pushing the U.S. into another war too soon in an attempt to be taken seriously on defense.
Speaking before Monday's talks in London, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said the "onus is on Iran" to prove its program is peaceful. He said the international community's confidence had been "sorely undermined by a history of concealment and deception" by Iran.
Straw said the dialogue with Russia and China was of "crucial importance."
British Prime Minister Tony Blair's official spokesman said the London talks signaled "growing international concern at the behavior of the Iranian government and at ... the words of the Iranian president," who has called for Israel to be "wiped off the map" and said the Nazi Holocaust a "myth."
Iranian state radio, meanwhile, reported that the government had allocated the equivalent of $215 million for the construction of what would be its second and third nuclear power plants. Iran plans to build 20 more nuclear plants, and Russia has offered to build some of them.
Dems looking for Impeachment?
A new Zogby poll got responses from 1,216 people about impeaching the president for wire taps. 52% said yes, 43% said no. The leading question "If President Bush wiretapped American citizens without the approval of a judge, do you agree or disagree that Congress should consider holding him accountable through impeachment?" did not ask if they thought the taps were illegal or being done on terrorists plotting more attacks on America.
In other words, this poll conducted for the democrat's is not about the intention of the president to find those who would kill American's, but if their all important civil liberties have been tread upon, despite the fact that it may have save their lives. Democrat's are playing right into the hands of our enemies because they put emotions of being politically correct into their decisions, which only leads disaster.
One of the main reasons there haven't been further attacks in America is because of wire tapping thwarting terrorists' plans.
During a time of war, most American's expect our government to do what it takes to keep the nation secure, and that is what the president's job is. George W. Bush is doing his job, that Bill Clinton failed miserably at.
Democrat's can't be serious, can they? Well after losing so badly on the Alito hearings, liberal democrat's are pissed-off royally, pulling their hair out and stomping on the floor in fits, as they see their 50 years of destroying America through the abortion of the "little guy" ie: babies, they claim to care so much about, coming to an end, which further exposes their ultimate liberal deception.
Democrat's are so desperate, so hatefully filled with revenge, they're ready to have innocent American's die in order to regain their power by revising history and unlearn the lessons of 9/11. That is what should send chills through every American!
It's too bad and sadly ironic that democrat's Al Gore, John Kerry, Chucky Schumer, Dick Durbin Teddy Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, Bill and Hill Clinton, and Pat Leahy, weren't aborted by their mothers. This nation would surely be much better off without those evil bastards having ever lived.
Liberalism's hypocrisy has cost America much in it's pretense of what it is clearly not, claiming to do good when it clearly has the opposite effect. The solution for liberals is to throw more money at whatever problem there is, instead of figuring out the solution, in despite of lessons to the contrary.
The following excerpt is from Michael Barone's The Beautiful People vs. The Dutiful People where he really nails the deceptions of the left.
"The late 1960s and early 1970s were a time of cultural conflict, a battle between what I have called the beautiful people and the dutiful people. While Manhattan glitterati thronged Leonard Bernstein's apartment to celebrate the murderous Black Panthers, ordinary people in the outer boroughs and the far-flung suburbs of New Jersey like Hamilton Township were going to work, raising their families, and teaching their children to obey lawful authority and work their way up in the world.
The glitterati in the 1970s seized and still hold the cultural commanding heights of our society -- the universities, the media, the Upper East Side of Manhattan and the Westside of Los Angeles. But, as the success of Sam Alito shows, they have not entirely won the hearts and the minds of the people.
I recently traveled through both Hamilton Township and Princeton. The contrast between the million-dollar-plus homes and fancy shops of Princeton and the modest-to-downright- depressing neighborhoods and strip malls of Hamilton Township was stunning. So, too, are the voting figures. Princeton voted 76 percent for John Kerry in 2004. Hamilton Township voted 49.3 percent for George W. Bush and 49.8 percent for Kerry.
Our universities today have become our most intellectually corrupt institutions. University administrators must lie and deny that they use racial quotas and preferences in admissions, when they devote much of their energy to doing just that. They must pledge allegiance to diversity, when their campuses are among the least politically diverse parts of our society, with speech codes that penalize dissent and sometimes violent suppression of conservative opinion."
Worried more about what other nations opinions are about America, liberals believe it is more important to appease them instead of doing what is right for our own country. They do not understand the concept of being an American because they've been taught in our schools by liberal educators to despise the U.S., its government and everything it does to keep peace in the world, and especially to hate the military and war, as if anyone likes it, but only as long as a Republican is president.
These radical liberals may yet cost America everything as they continue deceiving the public with empty promises and shrill complaints while ignoring our security, destroying our heritage and our promise as the greatest nation on earth.
© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.
|
Thursday, January 12, 2006
Dems Disaster on Display
Judging by the Alito confirmation hearings, each and every senate democrat that questioned him is evil at his/her core due to their support of killing babies while trying to tear apart families and religion using the liberal media to create false-reality TV programs about psuedo disfunctional families who have no idea they're on camera.
Providing sluts and prostitutes a legal way for them to stay in business by allowing them to murder conceived lives is clearly the single biggest priority for democrat's, as displayed by their vicious attacks during the Alito hearings.
How else can one explain their support of abortion, divorce, criminals, cheats, drugs, liars, terrorists', perversity, blasphemy, etc., et al?
As Ann Coulter so eloquently stated in Fork replaces donkey as Democratic Party symbol: "In the history of the nation, there has never been a political party so ridiculous as today's Democrats. It's as if all the brain-damaged people in America got together and formed a voting bloc."
These democrat's have not just become dumb all of a sudden, but have been slowly taken over by evil since their dippy-hippy days of the '60's they haven't yet grown-up from.
Democrat's are so mean that they made Alito's wife cry as she witnessed the treatment her husband received from them with deceptive, shameful attacks. How Many Dems Could Be Confirmed?
The main disaster for the democrat's, and the reason they're in such a mess, can be traced mainly to one person, Sen. Ted Kennedy, who has made liberalism equal to terrorism.
Since the early 60's, the Kennedy clan has been a disaster for this nation having wrecked havoc on everything good America has ever stood for prior to any Kennedy being in government. The strangest thing is that the democrat's can't let go of their dead rulers to this day. How many times must we go though JFK"s assassination, as if anyone cares anymore? He wasn't even a good president, having nearly gotten us into nuclear war with Russia after cheating to get elected.
Tom Bevan of Real Clear Politics has some good insight about the Defanged Liberal Lion
"Nobody has felt, or suffered, the weight of changes in the electoral landscape and the resulting shift in the power structure in Washington D.C. over the last twenty-five years more than Kennedy. He came to Washington in November 1962 as the brother of a sitting President and an Attorney General and as the member of a party that controlled 66 seats in the Senate and had an 83-seat majority in the House of Representatives. It was the height of both his family’s and his party’s power, and it has been more or less a downhill ride ever since."
The current and hopefully last Kennedy in U.S. government will be Teddy, who has taken far too much tax money from the people without giving anything of value in return for the past several decades, except of course if you like having murder legalized, and criminals given more rights than the average citizen.
What the hell good is Teddy anyway? All he's ever done in his life since his daddy got him his senate seat right out of college is to bitch about everything everday trying to bring this nation to its knees.
Perhaps it's Mary Jo Kopeckni' ghost who is still haunting him today. She was probably carrying his illegit child when he crashed his car, and did nothing to save her.
Democrats want to keep the murdering of innocent lives legal, and that is just plain evil.
Along with the vast majority of American's, I certainly hope and pray that abortion becomes illegal.
50 million babies being slaughtered is not something to be proud of, but liberals and democrat's are, and that is truly despicable!
All dems and so-called 'moderates' on either side, who approve of abortion will pay a huge price in the end for their selfish stupidity by favoring convenience ahead of innocence, putting death before life. In other words, democrat views are literally backwards to all moral decency, and they will pay eternally!
Ted Kennedy is the scum of the earth, and the best thing for this nation and the democrat's will be his own death and subsequent trip to eternal damnation. Then America can finally begin the healing process and promise of its founding.
Monsters like Chucky Schumer, John Kerry, Hitlery Clintoon, Nanny Pelosi, Dickweed Durbin and Diane Frankenstein are also dragging the dems into oblivion. Someday they will be joining Teddy again.
November will be a crushing blow for the leftist loonies, and I for one cannot wait!
© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.
|
Monday, January 09, 2006
Deflecting guilt
Well it's the New Year and government corruption is in full gear. The Abramoff crimes are a disgusting display of pay for play lobbying in Washington that has congress on both sides, shaking and pointing fingers.
By accusing republicans of taking money from Jack Abramoff who pled guilty Tuesday to conspiracy, fraud and tax evasion, more democrat's were more guilty of the same charges despite their talking point denials that came late and lame.
Abramoff also plans to implicate a number of U.S. lawmakers and congressional staffers in a bribery scandal that has democrat's running for the microphones to offer excuses.
Among those named as the worst examples of "Democrat hypocrisy" for taking money from Abramoff and his associates are: Sen. Byron Dorgan, (D-N.D.) who received at least $79,300; Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), who received at least $45,750; Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who received at least $68,941 and Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), who received at least $6,250.
Hillary Clinton spokeswoman Ann Lewis told The Buffalo News last Thursday that "after examining our records we found two contributions for $1,000 from tribes which have been clients of Jack Abramoff in the past."
These democrat's have pointed the finger with three back at them in their ultra-hypocrisy making the left turn red as the truth is exposed since the Lame Stinkin' Media (LSM) distortions to cover for guilty as sin democrats.
According to Newmax.com, "News of Mrs. Clinton's Abramoff connection comes the same day that her 2000 Senate campaign acknowledged it violated Federal Election Commission regulations by hiding hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign cash given by Hollywood mogul Peter Paul.
All this transpires against the backdrop of the Clinton campaign finance scandal of the late 1990s, where millions of dollars of illegal Chinese campaign cash found its way into Democratic Party and Clinton legal defense fund coffers.
The consequences of those transactions dwarf anything expected to emerge from the Abramoff imbroglio."
Republican leader Tom DeLay's time is done as the rest try to clean house of anyone else who may be involved. Those who are proven to be tied to corruption must be forced to resign from office, but the accusation's alone is enough to damage anyone these days, guilty or not, which makes most good people scared to get involved in government. These are problems that big government has created and is why it needs to be shrunk by at least half.
Certainly democrat's are always against smaller government as they protest every dime cut from spending bills as being the end of the world, with hysterical cries that people will starve to death if the money isn't spent. The use of scare tactics by the left is how the government monster was created long ago. Those same tactics are being used today by the media for the democrat's to keep spending levels growing to insane proportions, until one day everyone will be controlled by government.
The day is fast approaching when the "International Community" or "New World Order" is fully implemented by the European Union to take global control with help from the United States. Projects currently being worked on are in the Mediterranean, Israel/Palestine/Syria, Russia/Ukraine, Iran/Iraq, then Asia/Africa/India with other global alignment decisions to come.
Jack's Kicker
Senator's John McCain (R) Ariz., and Russ Feingold (D) Wis. have enabled Mr. Abramoff to raise money in the state of Arizona despite their much-ballyhooed Campaign Finance Reform Act (CFR). This reform was supposed to close the loopholes, but obviously CFR has created some new ones. Anyone look to see if Sens. McCain and/or Feingold made money from gambling?
My bet is that they are deeply involved as they were the ones who wanted this "law" in the first place.
The questions as to what lobbyists' contributions are acceptable for those who write the laws was to have been decided under CFR, but it seems that many were waiting and willing to take advantage of the loopholes it left wide open, including Abramoff who seemed to gain from his personal interpretation of the law, as he spread it around on both sides of the isle.
The next time a congressman says he's going to make a difference by promising reform, we all need to be suspicious, and look for the holes that bureaucrat's leave open, and close them before payoffs-to-passage can happen.
© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.
|