Tuesday, July 19, 2005
Plame's Blame Game Flame Out
This is the final word on the Wilson-Plame game being waged by the distractors in the liberal mainstream media for the democrats, and for Hillary's upcoming campaign for the White House.
By continuing to align themselves with a reputed liar in the conjured up CIA leak investigation, democrats have stepped into a mind field and are seeking to find their way out of it. Unfortunately for them, conjuring up more lies to cover old ones won't cut it with the American people, who know that their game is to bring the Bush presidency down at any cost. But like suicide bombers, liberals have convinced themselves of a future outcome they cannot possibly know as they march on towards self-destruction.
Since the original article by Joe Wilson in 2003, nothing about his story held water, as concluded by the Senate Intelligence Committee in an investigation demanded by democrats. The findings of that investigation prove that it is all nonsense.
But now it seems that the conclusions reached are not good enough for the angry liberal democrats, of which no amount of evidence can convince them otherwise, as the country witnessed when they gave ex-president Bill Clinton's confession of the Monica Lewinsky scandal during a speech where he had flat out lied to the entire nation while waging his finger, a pass. The line from liberals is, "Nope, I don't care what you saw, it just didn't happen!"
Democrats failed to impeach Clinton based on nothing but their fondness for him, even though the mountain of evidence against him for lying under oath was substantially correct. But democrats do not consider hard evidence, relying instead on their emotional feelings, that are subject to change with the wind. Have you noticed how hypocritical democrats are about holding "only certain people" to account? If they're not part of their accepted group, then they're labeled and trashed by the DNC or their henchmen in the media.
It has become all too-clear to everyone besides liberals, that Joe Wilson is a partisan democrat with an axe to grind against president Bush and his administration. The liberal media opened their arms up wide for 'Ol Joe, giving them a great cover shot on Vanity Fair, reminiscent of the Kennedy's.
Oh, how the liberals loved that.
Think this could have anything to do with this latest smear attempt by the media and democrats bent on personal destruction? Oh, nooooooooo of course not! But almost everyone knows the desperate straights the democrats are in, and how their friends in the falling old-media are trying to help them by re-creating these false allegations.
Now for the proofAccording to the democrats favorite DNC rag, the New York Times, in an article written by Mr. Wilson in July of 2003, after traveling to Iraq on assignment (from his wife no less), he asserted that he had found there were no grounds for believing Saddam had tried to buy nuclear materials, or "yellow cake" to use their favorite 'catch name' for shock value.
The problem for Wilson is that the British stand by their claim that Saddam WAS indeed trying to buy more uranium in Africa. Wilson said president Bush lied about it in his SOTU address. He didn't. Wilson and democrats did.
Seems Wilson wants to have his cake and eat it too, even if it's made of Uranium.
A special prosecutor was appointed to investigate charges by Joe Wilson and his wife Valerie Plame, with accusations of 'outing' her cover. (see previous article as to why she could not be outed) In September 2003, Wilson said, "It's of keen interest to me to see whether or not we can get Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs." He wrote a book called "The Politics of Truth," which got rave reviews from the mainstream press, and he became a foreign policy adviser to John Kerry's 2004 campaign., according to Michael Barone's article "Our Titus Oates."
That in a nutshell is what this entire fiasco is all about.
President Bush on Monday said: "If Crime Committed, Staffer Will Go" Obviously with that comment, Bush knows Rove is in the clear. He also knows who is not in the clear, and who will pay the price for it. My hunch is that Joe Wilson and his wife Valerie are in deep trouble. It is she who is likely to have her security clearance taken away in the same manner that democrats have demanded for Rove. You'll have to keep a close watch for it after this all dies down, as the media will cover it up the best they can.
Uranium JoeA detail that the MSM doesn't tell anyone is that by April 2003, when the U.S. invaded Iraq, Saddam Hussein had stockpiled 500 tons of yellowcake uranium at his al Tuwaitha nuclear weapons development plant south of Baghdad.
The New York Times has reported "The United States has informed an international agency that oversees nuclear materials that it intends to move hundreds of tons of uranium from a sealed repository south of Baghdad to a more secure place outside Iraq," the paper announced in a little-noticed May 2004 report. Google it libs.
The Times went on to report that amidst Saddam's yellowcake stockpile, U.S. weapons inspectors found "some 1.8 tons" that they "classified as low-enriched uranium." And Thomas B. Cochran, director of the nuclear program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, told the Times: "A country like Iran could convert that into weapons-grade material with a lot fewer centrifuges than would be required with natural uranium," he explained.
The Senate Intelligence Committee said in a report by both parties that Valerie Plame had suggested his name, to which Wilson denies.
In his report that Wilson gave to the CIA said that Iraq has tried to buy uranium in Niger in 1998, although they did not succeed in doing so. This proved that Bush did NOT lie, but that Wilson was the one lying for democrats political gain.
One more "minor" detail Mr. Wilson and the liberal press don't want the public to know about is that there's a huge reason Niger was such a favored place for Saddam's uranium shopping spree.
Responding to the firestorm that erupted after Wilson's July 2003 column, Prime Minister Tony Blair told reporters:
"In case people should think that the whole idea of a link between Iraq and Niger was some invention, in the 1980s we know for sure that Iraq purchased round about 270 tons of uranium from Niger."
This is actually an inside job that was concocted by the couple, when Wilson's wife Valerie Plame sent her husband to "discover" if their was anything to the Brits information.
Of course Wilson came back after only a short time and said there was none, but he certainly didn't look very hard, and if he had, he may have found out the truth, but he let his partisanship get in the way, as planned before hand.
After hearing insider chatter criticizing Wilson, Cooper said he called Rove, who apparently explained to Cooper that Wilson's mission had not been requested by then-CIA Director George Tenet or Vice President Dick Cheney. Cooper then sought confirmation for that.
It seems that the entire fiasco was planned by design between Plame and Wilson, a couple of liberal traitors who should actually be locked up for treason for falsifying information that makes anything Rove may have said pale in comparison.
The non-story without an end?Now, according to a report by Fox New's Sharon Kehnemui with the Associated press, Rove did not leak Plame's name and that there was no crime committed by Rove himself. Rove did not say that Plame worked for the CIA using her name. It was assumed by Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper, who was warned by Rove "not get too far out on Wilson." It was a warning democrats now wish he had heeded.
Indeed, the next day the vice president's chief of staff, I. Lewis [Scooter] Libby, told me Cheney had not been responsible for Wilson's mission," Cooper wrote, adding later that in August 2004, he told the grand jury that he asked Libby on background whether he had heard anything about Wilson's wife's sending her husband to Niger.
Libby replied, "Yeah, I've heard that, too, or words to that effect," Cooper wrote, adding that Libby did not reveal her name or where he had heard about Plame.
Pressed on Sunday if his wife was a CIA agent under cover at the time, Wilson stonewalled and avoided answering the question directly, as is typical of democrats who've been caught lying. Who'll ever forget Bill Clinton's full twist of the word 'is' ?
After his television appearance this past Sunday, Wilson told reporters that "whether it is a crime or not ... it is certainly an abuse of power" . For him I'm sure it is, because he desperately wants it to be, but that is not for him to decide. Democrats are realizing they've gone too far with this lie, and are now furiously backpeddling. However, the damage to the party has been done and the more the press makes of it, the more voters democrats will lose.
What about Iran's nukes Joe?Published on Tuesday we learn that negotiators for the Mullahs in Iran said, "Iran will resume uranium enrichment if the European Union won't recognize 'their right to do so." Say what? Now c'mon Joe, doesn't that trump your silly-old story that doesn't even hold water?
Imagine trying to negotiate against that kind of mindset. They're saying that the world can talk 'til it's blue in the face, and they still won't listen. Sound familiar? Saddam did the same thing all throught the 1990's right up to the Iraq war, so where is Joe Wilson now? Still lying about his exposed lie against his own country to distract us while we're being threatened with possible annihilation. That shows how much democrats care about America.
Did you get that democrats and liberals? Iran isn't listening to you or anyone. They're planning on going ahead with their nukes in order to attack Israel and/or the U.S..
So, democrats, please tell us with your "intellectual" brains exactly what should be done about it. Appeasement? FAILED. U.N. sanctions? They laughed, FAILED. Bribes for a country sitting on tons of oil? Yeah right. Just wait 'til they come to their senses? Sure if you've got another 100 years or so.
So what should we do? Hey, here's an idea, let's send Joe Wilson over to Iran to see if he can find their nuclear plants! Of course we'll have to get his wife's permission first, only this time let's make sure she's really an undercover agent for the CIA. How's that sound? Think that'll stop the administration from protecting the country with a pre-emptive strike if we can stall them by saying Bush lied?
Hey, maybe liberals can protest against Bush to just let Iran have their nukes, and trust them to never use 'em against us? Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Besides, they haven't done anything bad to us, right?
Oh, those hundreds of terrorist attacks since the 1970's, well those aren't any reason to get all bent out-of-shape are they?, 'cuz they won't attack anymore if we all just do as they say and denounce our religions, and conform to Islam, right? We don't really want to be a free nation anymore do we?, besides the media says the rest of the world hates us for it, and we all know how really important that is, right?
Watch as Wilson and Plame are abandoned in that mine field when the media comes to a grinding halt on this revamped non-story.
Sources:, RCP, NewMax, Drudge, Fox News, Chicago Sun-Times, New York TImes, Senate Intelligence Committe pdf
© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.|
Thursday, July 14, 2005
Dame Plame Bites the Dust
Well, we at least tried to warn them, but they just couldn't help themselves, and dove head first into the trash heap of rumors. My gosh, wouldn't you think they'd learn after the umpteenth embarrassment of jumping on a rumor only to have it backfire on them?
According to Victoria Toensing, Plame's circumstances don't meet several of the criteria spelled out in a 1982 statute designed not only to protect the identity of intelligence agents but to maintain the media's ability to hold government accountable, reported by WorldNetDaily.
Toensing – who drafted the legislation in her role as chief counsel for the chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence – says the Beltway frenzy surrounding Plame's alleged "outing" as a covert agent is a story arising out of the capital's "silly season."
The Federal code says the agent must have operated outside the United States within the previous five years. But Plame gave up her role as a covert agent nine years before the Rove interview, according to New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof. But at the same time, Wilson grudgingly acknowledged his wife was no longer in an undercover job at the time Novak's column first identified her. "My wife was not a clandestine officer the day that Bob Novak blew her identity," he said. So as the reality sunk in that there was no cover to blow in the first place, you could hear the dead silence on the left as they've been exposed for the deceptive liars they are, once again.
Democrats have been screaming for President Bush to fire Karl Rove over a memo about blowing a supposed CIA agents cover. Only it never happened. What did happen was to let the democrats think they had a case against Bush's main political advisor, then pull the rug out from under them with the truth.
They've fallen for it every single time, which is simply amazing after the last several fiasco's trumped up by liberals in the media that have blown up in their faces, namely the DNC's Rathergate smear attempt, thus helping to net George W. Bush more votes than any other president in U.S. history over his 2004 opponent Sen. John Kerry.
It's still hard to believe they didn't see it coming, again! Clearly blinded by rage, the democrats base of liberals is leading them to one dead end after another in a crazy maze of confusion following a misguided trail of revenge. The average is up to about once a month now for these democrat debacles.
Dems are taking a hard header on this one too. The immediate silence from the left is deafening.
According to the Washington Post, "Although the White House has previously said Rove was not involved in the episode, a recently disclosed internal Time magazine e-mail hints that Rove mentioned Plame, albeit not by name, to reporter Matthew Cooper before her name and affiliation became public in July 2003." Democrats assumed the rest just like they always do, then wonder what went wrong. No proof, they just know because they can feel it. But alas, it's just another red herring thrown out by the Bush team to the haters. Amazing!
I even went so far as to warn many liberals on other blogs that this was going to go nowhere, and the more they made of it the worse the backfire would be. But the know it all Liberals just don't want to hear the truth. Whatever is going on in their scheming minds is all liberals care about. They'd rather live in their world of conspiracy theories filled with wild accusations about Bush and/or the administration, simply because they can't stand being out of power over the people, and can't figure out how it happened.
From Wed. July 13, in the Wall Street Journal comes this bomb: "Democrats and most of the Beltway press corps are baying for Karl Rove's head over his role in exposing a case of CIA nepotism involving Joe Wilson and his wife, Valerie Plame. On the contrary, we'd say the White House political guru deserves a prize--perhaps the next iteration of the "Truth-Telling" award that The Nation magazine bestowed upon Mr. Wilson before the Senate Intelligence Committee exposed him as a fraud.
Dems have set themselves up for yet another crushing blow in '06.
For Mr. Rove is turning out to be the real "whistleblower" in this whole sorry pseudo-scandal. He's the one who warned Time's Matthew Cooper and other reporters to be wary of Mr. Wilson's credibility. He's the one who told the press the truth that Mr. Wilson had been recommended for the CIA consulting gig by his wife, not by Vice President Dick Cheney as Mr. Wilson was asserting on the airwaves. In short, Mr. Rove provided important background so Americans could understand that Mr. Wilson wasn't a whistleblower but was a partisan trying to discredit the Iraq War in an election campaign. Thank you, Mr. Rove."
The same bipartisan report also pointed out that the forged documents Mr. Wilson claimed to have discredited hadn't even entered intelligence channels until eight months after his trip. And it said the CIA interpreted the information he provided in his debrief as mildly supportive of the suspicion that Iraq had been seeking uranium in Niger.
Here's some more honest truth that won't register with liberals either... 'The vast majority of people are on to the libs and their anti-American socialist agenda, have soundly rejected it, and don't want to hear anymore whiney crap from them.'
Libs can't stand the fact that the economy is doing fine with the war in Iraq being waged and won for the Iraqi people's freedom under a Republican president, again, following Reagan's triumph in Russia. That makes it twice the democrats have been completely wrong about what freedom means to people who've never had it. It is also why they don't understand the U.S. Constitution, hence their lust to rewrite it using liberal judges.
The crushing blow to the liberal democrats came from where it all started, their friends in the media, leaving democrats humiliated and disgruntled one more time, but many will surely go back to take more pounding from the hammer of reality.
It's no wonder why so many have left the leftist losers to join the winners on the right. An emotional misfit can only take so much.
© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.|
Tuesday, July 12, 2005
Hillary Reads Mad Magazine?
The former first lady and current carpetbagger Hillary Rodham Clinton has compared the president of the United States to a character from a comic book that she keeps on her night stand for bedtime reading when Bill is out with other woman.
"I sometimes feel that Alfred E. Neuman is in charge in Washington," Clinton said during the inaugural Aspen Ideas Festival, organized by the Aspen Institute, a non-partisan think tank.
This comes at a time of global terrorism and just after more than 50 people were killed in three separate attacks on London with 700 plus injured. Great timing Shrillary.
Is that anyway for a candidate running for president to respond? Imagine if America was attacked again, would Hillary run for her comic book to get another insult for her to bash the president with?
In her speech Sunday, she accused the president of damaging the economy by overspending while giving tax cuts to the rich, depriving U.S. soldiers of equipment needed to fight the war in Iraq and cutting funds for scientific research.
In other words, the same old tired lies coming from another liberal democrat candidate. A democrat complaining about over spending? Now I've heard everything! Oh, that's right, it's for the military and the nations security, not wasteful government social programs,... what was I thinking?
Facts are that the unemployment rate was just reported last Friday to be 5%, and when revised will likely be even lower. The tax cuts as small as they were, are still obviously working for the American people, even during wartime, and has exposed the empty rhetoric from the left.
The U.S. soldier gets the best equipment available, according to the soldiers themselves. Hillary is clearly a desperate liberal woman who is distorting the truth because she has no other recourse against a popular president and republican majority that regained power due to her "husband's" failures she obviously played a large part in, according to her own book where she admits she's "History," and the latest best seller that further exposes her in "The Truth About Hillary." See linked ad on the left of this page.
Hillary is a liar pure and simple. Her thirst for power cannot be quenched, so she will continue to say the most absurd things ever heard, laced with emotional ploys she knows liberals will suck up like lemmings.
As RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt noted, "Hillary Clinton's opportunistic attempt to market herself as a centrist is like a wolf dressing up in sheep's clothing,"
She added, "Such thinly veiled rhetoric doesn't change the fact she is part of today's angry and adrift Democrat Party."
Absolutely correct, and now admitted to by Illinois' junior senator Barack Obama when he said this on Sunday; "The Democrats at times have lost their way," Obama conceded. "We are trying to decide what our core values are."
So there you have it, a democratic party with no core values, their leading candidate reading comic books, viciously bashing the president with wild-eyed lies, siding with Islamic fundamentalists during a global war on terrorism that threatens not only our freedom, but very existence!
I urge everyone to find out who this woman is and what her evil goals really are. Read the book!
© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.|
Wednesday, July 06, 2005
Justice for Life?
Now that there is a vacancy on the Supreme court, president Bush has his hands full in making his decision about how he wants the court structured. This is his decision to make, not the democrats, who falsely claim that they "must be consulted." But nowhere in the constitution does it say that the president needs to consult anyone in making his appointments, it is his sole responsibility granted to him by the U.S. Constitution.
I nearly fell off my chair after reading this... Hillary Clinton: Consult Dems on Supreme Pick
"In 1981, when President Reagan was faced with a vacancy on the Supreme Court, he selected Justice O'Connor," who she called "a consensus conservative nominee who became one of the Court's most respected members."
Is that why the democrats fought so hard against Her appointment then, Hillary? Democrats labeled her as too conservative, warning she would overturn Roe v. Wade. Well unfortunately that didn't happen, but democrats will use their repertoire of hysterics to scare woman against Bush's pick. Seems dems want women to have freedom to choose to kill their babies, but can't allow Bush his righteousness in choosing to save their lives.
As Thomas Sowell said so eloquently: "Although Justice O'Connor was one of the four who opposed this latest outrage, (about the eminent domain ruling) over the years she contributed more than her share to the uncertainties and confusions in the law resulting from such nebulous notions as "undue burden" and other "nuanced" policy-making that splits the baby instead of drawing a line."
Democrats are pulling out their usual emotional ploys again to get the public's back up against Bush and conservatives who want to protect life, while dems want to kill it before it can breath, so liberal women can keep on having promiscuous sexual relations, while not taking any responsibility for what comes after, all in the guise of it being some kind of "right" by some past liberal court justices, while not acknowledging what God's law says.
What democrats keep blinding themselves to is that their party continues to suffer dwindling numbers by allowing their women to commit infanticide, thus killing off their base of voters. The only alternative for democrat is to lie, cheat and steal votes like they've been doing for the past few decades, but they can't get away with it as easily anymore due to the freedom of the internet with bloggers checking the facts, and exposing their false statements and distortions. But even that is being threatened now by judges throwing people in jail for "abusing" their freedom of speech. The day of is coming when speech that goes against the government, but not religion, will be against the law if liberal judges continue to have their way by injecting their personal ideology.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said his former colleague has a "profound understanding" of judiciary matters and is known for a "no-nonsense style."
"Fred is a well-respected leader admired on both sides of the political aisle as someone who is fair-minded and straightforward," Frist said in a statement. "He is experienced in the ways of Washington and will undoubtedly provide valuable insight and counsel throughout the confirmation process."
Democrats must be shaking in their socks.
Conservatives want a judge who sticks to his core values, as Justice Thomas does, who sticks to the letter of the constitution, and is not swayed by what his emotionally corrupt liberal colleges desire. Justice Anthony Kennedy was once thought to be that kind of man, but he turned into jelly when confronted by liberals who have no regard for the constitution or what's best for America.
For those old enough to remember, who can forget how the democrats tried to smear president Reagan's appointment of Clarence Thomas in an evil web of lies and personal destruction? That's when many blacks bailed on the democrats, and have continued to do so. Would they make the same mistake against a Bush appointment of Hispanic heritiage? Sure they will because their anger and hatred overpowers any rational decisions they would otherwise make.
Liberals are fearful that putting another conservative judge on the court will overturn the 1973 case of Roe v. Wade that gave women across the country a license for mass murder of innocent lives. Most conservatives are praying that the president will nominate someone who will put an end to these self-serving attrocities, where women put themselves before the lives they took part in creating.
Will president Bush be willing to be as tough on picking this new justice as he is on the war? Democrats and liberals are dreading that he is, which would surely take their accusations that Bush is evil off the table. How can anyone be labeled as being evil by trying to save babies? Just ask a liberal, the majority of which care more about a woman's so called right, than keeping a live baby, ... well, alive.
Democrats WAR Strategery
Now Senate Judiciary Committee member Chuck Schumer has been quoted as saying on his cellphone that democrats are going to war over the Bush's pick, whomever it is!
Mr. Schumer has promised a battle Royale over whoever the President’s nominee was: “It's not about an individual judge… It's about how it affects the overall makeup of the court.”
With knife in hand, Chuckie Schumer proudly declared: “We are contemplating how we are going to go to war over this.”
What Chuckie is really saying is that The EVIL democrats want to keep killing innocent babies, and he wants to be the co-leader with Teddy Kennedy for proving to everyone just how despicably evil democrats really are.
Schumer also said that he wants dems to continue lying to the justices about what they believe, in order to get them on the left as they've done with Justice's Kennedy and O'Conner.
“Even William Rehnquist is more moderate than they expected. The only ones that resulted how they predicted were [Antonin] Scalia and [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg. So most of the time they've gotten their picks wrong, and that's what we want to do to them again.”
“A Priscilla Owen or Janice Rogers Brown style appointment may not have been extraordinary to the appellate court but may be extraordinary to the Supreme Court.”
So if democrats approved of Justice Brown then, how can they not approve of her for the USSC? Looks like dems are in another pickle, and will prove to the world that their words cannot be trusted, as they've promised not to fillibuster anymore judges. That was the deal worked out to stop Sen. Frist from using the so-called Nuclear Option, one that he will now be forced to use if and when the democrats try to block Bush's judicial appointments.
During Justice O'Connor's 1981 confirmation hearing, Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) correctly noted that it was "offensive to suggest that a potential justice must pass the litmus test of any single-issue interest group." Over twenty years later Sen. Kennedy seems to have flipped at the expense of history. In a new statement of hypocrisy, Sir Arrogance notes "As part of the confirmation process, the American people will reasonably expect those questions to be asked and the nominees to answer them." No, Sen. Kennedy, the American people expect a confirmation process that is civil, respectful, and that keeps politics out of the judiciary especially by radical anti-American liberals such as yourself, John Kerry, HIllary Clinton, Howie Dean, Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Chuck Schumer etc..
The American NightmareIn their infamously outrageous decision to strip citizens and taxpayers of the right to own their own property, the Supremo's blew it bigtime. The American people have had their dream turned into a nightmare by this ill-conceived decision that goes against the fundamental principles of the U.S. Constitution.
Democrats and especially liberals, want whatever will hurt this nation and eventually kill it's freedom with bigger government regulations that they want for controlling everyone's lives, because they feel that government knows best what is good for everyone, and that there should be no individual decisions made by the people.
'We The People' have been ripped right out of the Constitution by these justices who've crumpled it up America's founding document and thrown it away.
Democrats want the constitution replaced with a new form of socialized government where everyone is equal, and individual ideas are not accepted. Where government controls everyone's lives and no decisions have to be made by the people, but only by a few. Where no religion exists and everyone can do as they please as long as they follow endless regulations and laws.
In other words, democrats are succumbing to the EU's way of government that we came over here to escape from more than 229 years ago. The current crop of justices have wrongly used the EU's opinions in forming decisions they make for American law, which is fundamentally committing treason in the name of balance, but is really just more implementation of the New World Order, where man rules all, and God and religion are put out to pasture, as evidenced by their latest anti-Christian decision to remove the Ten Commandments from the inside of court buildings.
Watch as this so-called "split-decision" will eventually split this nation and then the world apart, if it is not soon corrected.
© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.|