Monday, November 14, 2005
Bush Finally Stands-Up to War Critics
In a long overdue speech concerning critics of the war, president Bush finally has exposed the democrats talking out the sides of their mouths.
The president and his team will launch an aggressive defense against the misleading and vicious attacks - primarily by hypocritical Democrats - that "Bush lied” about the war in Iraq. Democrats constantly state the opposite of reality and truth because they have literally nothing to offer the country, but whiney protests that only damages the nation and gives aid and comfort to our enemies.
The media is also to blame for supporting democrat lies against the administration. In a NEW Confirmation by Pew Research Poll found that the media is heavily biased against Republicans and president Bush. Pew Poll: Bush Not Treated Fairly by Press
"The stakes in the global war on terror are too high and the national interest is too important for politicians to throw out false charges," the president said in his combative Veterans Day speech.
"Some Democrats and anti-war critics are now claiming we manipulated the intelligence and mislead the American people about why we went to war," Bush said.
"More than 100 Democrats in the House and the Senate who had access to the same intelligence voted to support removing Saddam Hussein from power," Bush said.
"We will never back down. We will never give in. We will never accept anything less than complete victory," he said Friday.
Democrats believe they can push this president around with false accusations about the war. They should remember that Bush is steadfast in his convictions and that they are only making themselves look weak, damaging the war effort and inciting terrorists' to continue killing.
"If you’ll notice, Democrats say ‘Bush Lied’ but they never cite specific examples,” Fred Barnes said. "That’s because they were saying the same things and many of their comments are captured on tape.
"To say that the president lied about the reasons to liberate Iraq is just incorrect. Ask the people of Iraq and they'll tell you that Saddam had to be removed. There is no doubt about that."
Bush offered a forceful defense of the war in Iraq, saying it is the central front in the war on terror and that extremists are trying to establish a radical Muslim empire extending from Spain to Indonesia.
The Case For WarThe real issue, as it stood throughout all of 2002, started with this declaration by the President in his State of Union address in late January of that year:
"Our nation will continue to be steadfast and patient and persistent in the pursuit of two great objectives. First, we will shut down terrorist camps, disrupt terrorist plans, and bring terrorists to justice. And, second, we must prevent the terrorists and regimes who seek chemical, biological or nuclear weapons from threatening the United States and the world." – PRESIDENT BUSH
Will democrats keep backing liar Joe Wilson?
"I remain of the view," Wilson told the EPIC forum crowd two months after the fall of Baghdad, "that we will find chemical and biological weapons, and we may well find something that indicates that Saddam's regime maintained an interest in nuclear weapons."
Wilson made this extraordinary statement after he had started leaking to the media about President Bush's alleged WMD deceptions and just weeks before his celebrated New York Times op-ed piece.
This one sentence would seem to undercut the argument waged by him and literally millions of other self-deluding "progressives" around the world that "Bush lied" about Iraq's WMD threat. Since Bush's most hostile critics in the intelligence community believed Saddam possessed such weapons, one has to ask why Bush would have needed to fabricate evidence.
Eight months later (a pretty pathetic rush to war, if you ask me) Bush made the same cogent, powerful argument directly to the United Nations on September 12, 2002. The UN Security Council responded by unanimously approving Resolution 1441 on November 8 which gave Iraq "a final opportunity" to "provide accurate, full, final, and complete disclosure" of its past and present WMD activities.
Almost three weeks went by before inspections resumed in Iraq on November 27, 2002. At this point there was still a general consensus among intelligence agencies around the world - not to mention policy experts and politicians from both sides of the aisle in the U.S. dating back nearly 10 years - about what type of WMD Iraq was potentially concealing.
Democrats have been acting very childishly fabricating evidence against the president using Joe Wilson and his wife Valerie Plame and their false accusations. In the end they shall not succeed as Bush is putting his foot down to crush the liberals and their anti-American rants that should be interpreted as treason for which Joe Wilson will someday face trial for, including his lies against the president of the Untited States of America. The anti-American liberal media (cbs, nbc, abc, pbs, cnn) will then either not report it or will spin it all against America and the president for the benefit of desperate democrats who continue losing support.
SAFER with GOPThere is no doubt whatsoever that America is better off with Republicans at the helm defending the nation than weak-kneed democrats who's only objective is taking the people's money and power away for themselves in selfish bitterness and resentment. Democrat's have proven they are not worthy of governing America, as they have no plans to take the country forward. See: What's the Plan from The Real Clear Politics blog post.
In answering questions, democrats have been forced to acknowledge their lack of vision and that their only alternative is to bash Bush using the media with falsehoods. Howard Dean has lost it again as he unapologentically slanders blacks with racism.
Ex-Veep Al Gore is up his old game of "Global Warming" claiming, 'it is more serious than terrorism.' There is no actual proof of anyone dying from so-called 'warming', but there are plenty of death records due to Islamic terrorism. One has to ask: Is it any wonder why the Clinton administration failed to protect the nation in the years leading up to 9/11? Were the democrat's more concerned about trees and pollution's than terrorists' killing thousands of people all over the globe in Jihad?
The priority for democrat's is not about protecting the people, it is about scaring them into giving their money and power to liberals, for nothing in return except empty social programs that are in constant states of disrepair, thus requiring more tax money in a never ending charade of complaints.
© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.|