Thursday, October 13, 2005
Had Al Gore Been President...
Al Gore has confirmed that America would be a much different country today had he been elected president.
Gore said In Sweden: "If I Were President 'We Would Not Be Routinely Torturing People... We Would Be A Different Country'..."
We certainly would be. Al would've had Osama bin Laden over at the White House for a tea following the terror attacks on 9/11 in yet another round of appeasing the enemy that both he and Clinton enabled without any real response during the 1990's decade of terror attacks on America and our interests abroad.
It has become clear if not obvious to most, that Clinton and Gore approved of terrorism to keep the focus off Bill's precious (but false) economy, by not drawing attention to terrorist acts by fighting against them as they should have.
Al confirms this in his continuation: "We would not have invaded a country that didn't attack us," he said, referring to Iraq.
The fact is that Saddam did have many connections to the terrorists', that have not been reported in the liberal media, which he wants full control of, even while again stating the opposite. Saddam was also paying Palestinians to commit suicide bombings against innocent Israeli men, women and children.
1After the Khobar Towers attack, Clinton said upon learning of the bombing,: "The cowards who committed this murderous act, must not go unpunished. Let me say again: We will pursue this. America takes care of our own." Clinton made his semi-apology to Iran before officially requesting its cooperation in the Khobar case, which he did only in October 1999 and never backed up with international pressure.
FBI director Louis Freeh, and those around him, began to suspect that the administration didn't care that much about finding the perpetrators because if connections with Iran were established it would be forced to take, or at least consider, action against Iran. This meant that getting to the bottom of the case would present what the Clinton administration hated most: a difficulty, a risk.
Referring to the economy, Gore said: "We would not have taken money from the working families and given it to the most wealthy families."
The truth and reality is that nobody took money from 'working families,' and especially did not give it to the wealthy. Gore constantly refuses to accept that the money was never the governments in the first place. The wealthy do not take money from the government, they send it to the government in disproportionate taxation. Is it any wonder why Al Gore lost so badly on playing the class warfare card in the 2000 election? This is further proven by Kerry's dismissal of the gambit in his 2004 run. Gore is living in some past decade when most people didn't have stocks, bonds and 401k's, being somewhat more naive about having their money taken away by government taxation.
Money was given back to the working families in tax relief – two words not in Gore's vocabulary. Individuals and families showed their gratitude by reelecting president Bush with the most votes for any president in history, over war veteran-traitor and communist pig, John Kerry.
In fact our tax system is set up just opposite of what Gore states, where the wealthy pay far more in taxes than those who make less. (read taxes below)
So Gore would've raised taxes even higher after the recession that he and Bill created with the false bubble and corporate corruption during the last 4 years of their control, which would've had the worst effect on the economy, driving us into a deep depression similar to the 1930's.
That is ultimately very much the goal of democrat's for America's future, to bring back the era of big government controlling people by driving out individual ambition, thus replacing it with reliance on government welfare like the days of the Great Society when being a democrat was the "in thing." Thank goodness America has grown-up since then.
Al Gore is a deceiver who has no clue about reality, and feels the American people are stupid enough to listen to his b.s.. Just listen to his words.
"We would not be trying to control and intimidate the news media." Gore said.
This is why he created his own TV station,... to spread liberal-socialist propaganda to those dumb enough to suck it up. Gore feels that as long as the media is bowing down to his and the wishes of the DNC, that they should be able to lie to the people as Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw and Peter Jennings did for 40 years before the internet came and exposed them for the manipulating liars they were.
Democrats do it all the time, but are now losing the battle. One only has to read the New York Times to see their blatant bias, that they are now attempting to charge money for on line. Paul Krugman is the best example of erroneous liberal editorialism there is. Only the rich elites can afford to pay for that kind of crap, which again proves Al Gore's class warfare is as bogus as ever.
But Clinton and liberal democrats DO control the media even today, and did so during the '90's as well giving Clinton a pass on most everything he did wrong, but were forced to cover some of it as they couldn't cover-up his deviant behaviour for long.
"We would not be routinely torturing people," Gore said.
"To accuse Americans of participating in 'routine torture' is absurd and reveals that while Al Gore may no longer be a leader in his party, he still embodies the maniacal anger that guides Democrat leaders in Washington today," Schmitt wrote in an e-mail to The Associated Press.
Gore didn't learn from Sen. Dick Durbin's (D) comments that were rejected by the American people, outright. Durbin had to apologize for his Nazi remarks about our troops a few months ago that were grossely false and way out of line.
Al Gore would probably have caved-in-to Islamic radicals and converted the nation to Islam as a gesture of good will sold as political correctness. He'd of had our children learning the Koran and praying to Allah five times a day while also learning to hate the Jews in school, as taught by the Palestinians and Jihadists'.
Al would've dismantled our military, and side with the Arabs to have Israel destroyed by following Islamic Mullah decrees.
Al Gore is a danger to the planet, but thankfully most people with any brains realize he's a fool of epic proportions who puts his own interests ahead of everyone else's.
Truth on TaxesI was asked to post this on my site from a response I gave to a question in the comment's section by the author of Let Our Voices Be Heard concerning how the war in Iraq, and hurricanes Katrina and Rita would be paid for "without at least freezing current tax cuts," (ie; raising taxes). This was originally directed at one person, but for this post, it is directed at all Liberal pawns of the rich democrats.
It is amazing that you deny solid evidence. The numbers and facts I've given you are simple enough to understand for most of us who have received proper education, but that was before the democrats ruined the system by hiring teachers who can't pass their own tests, which unfortunately you may have been a student of.
In any case, here is the answer to your question, which I'm quite sure you'll bash even if you do comphrehend it.
I'll try to answer your question as simply as I can so you can grasp the basics of how economics work. I won't even use any numbers to save you from thinking too much.
The first thing you need to know is that raising taxes will not help to pay for the war, and would actually have the opposite effect.
Here's why. As I said before and which the "Government Tax Receipts" link I previously provided clearly proves, the best way for the government to bring money in to help pay for the war is to let people keep more of their own money to spend as they see fit. At first glance it seems contradictory doesn't it? But if you take an honest look at it, you'll see that it makes perfect sense, provided you have some common sense to begin with.
You have to ask yourself this question: how has the deficit has gone down even with the war going on? ANSWER: Because people have had more of their own money to spend on things they need, which ARE TAXED! That is where most of the money comes from and how the economy can expand.
Raising taxes STIFLES spending just as raising interest rates STIFLES borrowing.
If you raise taxes, people won't have that money to spend on products they would otherwise be paying taxes on.
Are you starting to get it yet?
Think about it, I mean really think hard. Everything you buy is TAXED and the government gets a cut. Every item bought and sold, imported and exported has a TAX on it, everyday 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
Then we also pay income TAXES on top of that with each paycheck!
Then we pay a another huge TAX once a year on a percentage of our hard earned money that was already TAXED before! Amazing isn't it?
So, OUR government TAXES every single product, every single pay check and then TAXES the income earned that they didn't TAX before. Then they TAX any interest earned too!
That's why people have a hard time saving anything.
If people are not buying things because they have to save that much more money to pay their INCOME TAXES by April 15th, they aren't going to be buying as much, which means less money will be going into the government coffers.
So how will the war get paid for? By the American people making the economy and free market work the way it was supposed to, which creates more jobs and hence revenue for the government, that already has more than enough to pay for it.
Unemployment before the hurricane was 4.9% which is extremely low and lower than when Clinton was in office. Oops, I used a number, sorry.
(D)on't fool yourself. The rich democrats know this stuff too, and they use it against YOU by pulling at your emotions to distract you from seeing what they are really doing in order to steal more of YOUR (not the governments) money.
When you go buy a car, do you let the salesman use emotional tactics on you to get the price UP? My guess is that YOU DO, because you place emotions ahead of common sense, which is exactly what democrat salesmen (I feel your pain) rely on too!
It's time for people to start THINKING!
I hope this makes sense to you because it's the truth. You need to take an honest look at the big picture here to understand these things.
If you can keep the emotions out of it as many ex-democrats have found out, then you'll be on your way to living in reality where the TRUE facts beat emotional propaganda (false conspiracy theories) everytime.
P.S., If you have anymore questions, or comments, I'll try to answer them as sincerely and honestly as I can.
One more thing. The U.S. economy is somewhere around 12.8 *** TRILLION *** dollars.
(Sorry I had to use a number here)
How much was Bush's tax cut? A drop in the proverbial ocean! A cup of coffee to Starbucks....
Like I said, start thinkin'... !
2 "The reality is that the wealthy pay almost all of the federal income tax, and there is clear and compelling evidence that our tax system -- especially its misguided redistributive elements -- imposes a heavy cost in terms of growth that is ultimately paid by the non-wealthy in the form of lower productivity and, hence, lower wages and incomes.
According to a new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office, we pay a very heavy price for the heavy taxation of saving, investment, corporations and estates that [liberals] strongly favor. It found that the efficiency cost of the tax system -- the output that is lost over and above the tax itself -- is between 2 percent and 5 percent of the gross domestic product. In short, we lose between $240 billion and $600 billion every year just because of the way we raise taxes."
SOURCES: 1 NRO, 2 Realities of the Tax Burden
© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.|