UPDATE: Senate Considers Hearing on Able Danger Findings

Committee chairman Tom Kean seems to be stalling the inevitable exposure of the coverup, by trying to pass the buck to the current administration, and therefore not get egg on the commissions faces.

"The files are in the possession of the Defense Department, so really nobody else besides the administration can get to the bottom of it ... if there exists a file on Able Danger," said Chairman Kean.

But Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pa., said the commission is passing the buck.

"I'm not going to let them blame the Pentagon because the military officers that offered to brief them offered on two different occasions," he said.

Now read about this outrage about how Clinton Lawyers Fretted Over Bin Laden's Comfort
"The lawyers were more concerned with bin Laden`s safety and his comfort than they were with the officers charged with capturing him," former Bin Laden desk chief Michael Scheuer told MSNBC's "Hardball.


Surprising in itself, the New York Times came out today with a damning article written with newly de-classified information concerning how the Clinton administration knew of Osama bin Laden's terror group in 1996.

"State Department analysts warned the Clinton administration in July 1996 that Osama bin Laden's move to Afghanistan would give him an even more dangerous haven as he sought to expand radical Islam "well beyond the Middle East," but the government chose not to deter the move, newly declassified documents show.


Prime Minister Rafik Hariri and Clinton shown after denying OBL warning

Two years after the State Department's warning, with Mr. bin Laden firmly entrenched in Afghanistan and overseeing terrorist training and financing operations, Al Qaeda struck two American embassies in East Africa, leading to failed military attempts by the Clinton administration to capture or kill him in Afghanistan. Three years later, on Sept. 11, 2001, Al Qaeda struck the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in an operation overseen from the base in Afghanistan." Full article continued



According to this article by the Associated Press, An Army intelligence officer said Wednesday he told staff members from the Sept. 11 commission that a secret military unit had identified two of the three cells involved in the 2001 terrorist strikes more than a year before the attacks.

Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, who said he was associated with the "Able Danger" unit, said that during a 2003 meeting in Afghanistan, he mentioned that the unit had identified Sept. 11 ringleader Mohamed Atta along with three other hijackers as terrorist suspects.

Three months later, in January 2004, Shaffer said he was back in the United States and offered to follow up with the commission, but his offer was declined.

"I just walked away shocked that they would kind of change their mind, but I figured someone with equal or better knowledge ... probably came and talked to them, so they must've taken care of it," Shaffer said.

Shaffer said he was told the commission obtained only two briefcase- size loads of documents from at least 15-plus boxes of information on Able Danger.

Lt. Col. Chris Conway, a Pentagon spokesman, said Wednesday an investigation into Able Danger was under way.

---

9/11 Wall of Lies

The 9/11 Report has been confirmed as a massive deception by democrats wanting to protect ex-president Clinton and his administration of misfits.

The following is critical information concerning evidence about how 9/11 was allowed to happen by certain people in the U.S. government, and exposes who is actually at fault for the worst attack on American soil in history.

The cover-up is still going on in the liberal media who try to blame republicans for everything democrats have done wrong. They've been using Cindy Sheehan's lame protest at Bush's ranch as a distraction from this damning evidence.

It also confirms what many (including myself) realized it in 1991.

Here's what this author said then: "Bill Clinton would be (and now is) the worst president in the history of America."


I urge everyone who has an interest in the truth to read the following and then go to the rest of the article that is linked.

Please Remember these facts when you vote!

---

"This is a critically important story that demands public attention. It will not be seriously investigated by many reporters, because the mainstream (read: leftist) media is not interested in exposing how its favorite president in decades enabled terrorists to pull off the worse act of domestic terrorism in U.S. history." – FrontPageMagazine.com


Her infamous 1995 “wall” memo produced much of the harmful lack of intelligence coordination that the Commission then used to criticize the Bush administration. As FrontPage Magazine’s Jean Pearce wrote last May, the intelligence wall Deputy Attorney General Gorelick put in place smothered ongoing investigations into Chinese contributions to Bill Clinton’s presidential campaigns. Specifically the Department of Defense and the CIA were prohibited from exchanging relevant information with the FBI.

Was it Ms. Gorelick who steered the Sept. 11 Committee hearings away from the evidence connecting the Clinton administration? Obviously Gorelick was a plant by the Clinton's on the 9/11 commission.

Not all were happy at the time with Gorelick's action. Gutsy New York City-based U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White was appalled by the Gorelick directive, sending two of her own memoranda back to Janet Reno and Gorelick protesting, “The most effective way to combat terrorism is with as few labels and walls as possible so that wherever permissible, the right and left hands are communicating.” Her recommendations were ignored. According to the New York Post, White was so incensed by their actions that she wrote a second, scathing memorandum warning that the “wall” hindered law enforcement efforts to combat terrorism. “It will cost lives,” she reportedly warned. This second memo is still kept secret.

The Full article is here: 9/11 Coverup Commission

Also see: "Dean's New Admissions, 9/11 Commission" posted below.


Please pass this vital information along for the sake of continued freedom in America, and to keep democrats out of the White House forever.

Sources:
The New York Times

FrontPageMagazine.com

© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.

|