With his ranting and finger wagging at Chris Wallace on Fox News last Sunday, ex-president Clinton reminded all who watched that he is still in denial of reality, and cannot speak the truth.

Floundering Democrats in some backward plan, are hoping to gain traction by rekindling memories of republican's attacking Clinton during the '90's which at times made Clinton's approval numbers go higher, at least according to the media then. But last Sunday, Clinton looked and sounded like a mad-man making irrational comments while pointing his finger at Wallace and poking his leg as his face turned beet red in anger, a side of Clinton he has kept hidden until now.

Jeff Jacoby's "A war we have to win" in The Boston Globe wrote:

"Could 9/11 have been prevented? That in essence was what Chris Wallace asked former President Bill Clinton during his interview: ``Why didn't you do more to put bin Laden and Al Qaeda out of business when you were president? . . . Why didn't you . . . connect the dots and put them out of business?"

From the ferocity of Clinton's response, you would have thought he'd been accused of using a 22-year-old White House intern for sex. Purple-faced with rage, he blasted Wallace for doing a ``nice little conservative hit job on me." He fumed that he had ``worked hard to try and kill" bin Laden and that ``all the right-wingers" who criticize him for doing too little ``spent the whole time I was president saying, `Why is he so obsessed with bin Laden?' "

But Wallace's question was no ``hit job." No one ever accused Clinton of being too obsessed with bin Laden. On the contrary: The eight years of his presidency, like the first eight months of Bush's, were marked at the top by a tragic inattention to Al Qaeda. The 9/11 Commission Report records the exasperated reaction of a State Department counterterrorism officer to Clinton's refusal to retaliate for the bombing of the Cole: ``Does Al Qaeda have to attack the Pentagon to get their attention?""


Clinton told Wallace, “There is not a living soul in the world who thought that Osama bin Laden had anything to do with Black Hawk Down.” But nobody said there was. The point of citing Somalia in the run up to 9-11 is that bin Laden told Fortune Magazine in a 1999 interview that the precipitous American pullout after Black Hawk Down convinced him that Americans would not stand up to armed resistance.

It is likely Clinton believes we've forgotten about his impeachment and punishment. However, the disgrace of Clinton's era is still burnished in the memories of most American's, along with knowledge of his doing little to fight terrorism since the first WTC attack in '93, where as president he did not even visit, fluffing it off as a small incident.

According to Richard Miniter's article, "What Clinton Didn't Do . . .
. . . .and when he didn't do it." in the Wall Street Journal, Sept. 27, 2006:

"In his Fox interview, Mr. Clinton said "no one knew that al Qaeda existed" in October 1993, during the tragic events in Somalia. But his national security adviser, Tony Lake, told me that he first learned of bin Laden "sometime in 1993," when he was thought of as a terror financier. U.S. Army Capt. James Francis Yacone, a black hawk squadron commander in Somalia, later testified that radio intercepts of enemy mortar crews firing at Americans were in Arabic, not Somali, suggesting the work of bin Laden's agents (who spoke Arabic), not warlord Farah Aideed's men (who did not). CIA and DIA reports also placed al Qaeda operatives in Somalia at the time.

By the end of Mr. Clinton's first year, al Qaeda had apparently attacked twice. The attacks would continue for every one of the Clinton years."

See the terror list here.


Back to bashing the war
Now the dems are back to bashing the war on terror and Bush's handling of it, as if they did any good during Clinton's years. Democrat's are desperately at a loss for ideas having to conjure up and spew more anti-American deceptions in order to get attention from the media and public. What are they thinking?

The papers' headlines were unequivocal, but the stories themselves never actually quoted the NIE. They merely passed along the spin -- and advanced the anti-Bush agenda -- of the anonymous sources who chose this moment to leak secret intelligence for political purposes.

The left claims that new terrorists are being enlisted at a growing rate and that America's presence in Iraq has become a major terrorist recruitment tool.

President Bush has made that point repeatedly, quoting Osama bin Laden's declaration that the war in Iraq is ``the most serious issue today for the whole world " and will end in ``victory and glory or misery and humiliation." Has US military action in Iraq inflamed the global jihad? Undoubtedly. But just imagine how galvanized it would be by a US retreat.

Democrats want to go back to the 1960's-'70's era of when their bashing of America was popular, making them feel so good and superior. Now since they can't go back that far, they want to go back to the Clinton years of ignoring terrorism when they were pumping up a false economy with massively higher taxes, tearing down our national defense and being politically correct in appeasing our enemies.

Sorry Democrat's, America won't go back!

Labels: Constitution, Democracy, Freedom, Government, Liberals, Media, Political, Propaganda, Republic, Tax Cuts

© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.

|

Nearly all the Democrat's and a few Republican's seem to care more about giving civil liberties to terrorists who want to cut their heads off than protecting Americans from terrorism.

Dems want to stop the government from listening in on terrorists' planning to do another 9/11 or worse on American soil or abroad.

The president's preferred measure would withhold classified evidence from defendants in terror trials, using coerced testimony and protecting U.S. interrogators against prosecution for using methods that may violate the Geneva Conventions. Some in Congress like McCain want to protect the enemy because he was a (brain washed) prisoner for five years.

Why should terrorists' who want to commit homicide bombings, who don't care about their own lives, be given protections under the Geneva Conventions? These are not American's or fighting state soldiers, they are terrorists' who have no rights and should not be given any.

Al Qaeda is a loose band of murderer's trying to force Islam onto the world, and now many in the world seem to be letting them as they spread their hateful-fascist ideology found in the Koran–a book written by a madman well after the Bible, twisting its words with evil intent.

Last year, Senator John McCain overcame Bush's objections to pass legislation banning cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of detainees. These are the same detainees that have sawed-off the heads of many innocent civilians including Daniel Pearl. This is how we should honor their sacrifice? I think NOT! Those were the true Martyrs, not the homicide bombers who believe they're doing it for 72 virgins, which is simply stupid. Protect those idiots? Forget it!


Damn the Politics
In the middle of an election season, during this war on terror, John McCain (who I'll never vote for) three more rebellious Republican Senator's, John Warner of Virginia, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Susan Collins of Maine. defied President Bush on Thursday and approved terror-detainee legislation he has vowed to block, deepening Republican conflict over terrorism and national security.

The president reminded Congress that "the most important job of government is to protect the homeland."

Bush said: "I will resist any bill that does not enable this program to go forward with legal clarity,"

As Mr. Bush noted last week, these enemies "represent no nation, they defend no territory, and they wear no uniform.... They operate in the shadows of society.... They conspire in secret, and then they strike without warning." As on September 11.

This is how far off the left has gone... "We just don't want to see Americans' rights abused for the next 50 or 60 years because of an oversight on our part," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who joined some Republicans in opposing some amendments offered by her Democratic colleagues.

The Bill is not about Americans' rights, it is about stopping terrorists'. Liberal Democrats want to make sure terrorists are given rights, making sure those rights are given more protections than criminals in America, and will not be abused by the same people terrorists' want to kill.

If there are American terrorists' then they don't have any rights anyway as they've given them up by committing treason. The left wants to make all those who hate America hero's who should be held up as role models, and especially if they're anti-religion, which I'm afraid seems to be what the world has in store for the future, to rid it of all religion, making one for all. Much of this can be seen today even in America and certainly in the European Union.

© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.

|

If ex-prez Bill Clinton had his way, we'd all believe he didn't have sex with that woman, and that he stopped Osama bin Laden from attacking the World Trade Center and Pentagon.

This is essentially what he and the Democrats are trying to make ABC believe as reasons for censoring the upcoming docudrama miniseries "The Path to 9/11," set to air Sunday and Monday on the fifth anniversary of America's worst ever attack.

Former national-security adviser Sandy Berger was convicted of stealing classified documents out of the National Archives, for which he was fined. But what happened to those docs? Obviously he stole the ones incriminating himself and Clinton. They should be in jail now for that crime alone.

Clinton wants the truth covered up for him and his inept administration's blatant failures concerning terrorism, making it no more than a police matter. The fact is that Osama bin Laden had declared war on America at least twice during Clinton's time in office, and he did far too little to combat it.

By attacking ABC, demanding it "correct all errors," Clinton and his cronies hope to avoid embarrassment for their lack of resolve against terror attacks throughout the 1990's, including the first attack on the WTC in 1993 followed by the Kobar Towers, the African embassy bombings, and the USS Cole, all while the Clinton administration kept telling America, “Don’t worry, be happy, nothing going on here." The lying liberal media made it possible for Clinton to ignore his responsibilities while he partied every night of the week with Hollywood celebs.

According to Clinton's long time as strategist Dick Morris said that Clinton's national security adviser, Sandy Berger, and the president himself "were both responsible for failing to catch or kill Osama bin Laden on several different occasions."

"The president had yet to make a finding that it was OK to kill bin Laden. The reason he had not is that he did not yet know bin Laden's connection to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The reason he did not know that is that he did not fast-track the investigation. Clinton aide says 9/11 film 'correct'

The commission's report, released in the summer of 2004, "highlighted the weak, incompetent, hesitant, and inconsistent attempts of the Clinton administration to kill or capture Osama bin Laden," according to the book, which devotes an entire chapter to Clinton's mishandling of the threat.

"The report's account shows the president and his advisers at their worst." Because they were the worst!

It is true that Clinton was distracted by the impeachment hearings, that wouldn't have happened had he not fooled around with Monica Lewinsky in the first place, and had instead been doing the job he swore under oath to do. Instead he lied under oath in court, and the entire nation on national TV.

Democrats have just been exposed on another huge lie they told about the Plame/Wilson CIA leak that never was. See our post for those lies here.

Who could ever think Clinton is not lying now about 9/11? The truth is that Bill Clinton is a massive liar and he's trying to censor the facts from the American people, and democrats are helping him to do it by telling more lies on top of lies.

It is time for the truth to be told to the American people and the world about how Clinton totally blew it, and cost the lives of thousands of innocent American's and Trillions in damage to the economy.

Bill Clinton, Sandy Berger, Maddie Halfbright and Janet Reno should be arrested, thrown in jail, and face trial for their failures, along with all those in the media covering up for them.

Bill Clinton was by far the worst, most incompetent and laziest president America has ever had, and history should show that no matter what the whiners on the left gripe about.

It is time for them to all grow up and face reality for once in their pathetic lives. America is under attack to this day from the Islamic facists who want to rule the world and force everyone to accept Islam as their religion, or die.

It has become very clear that current Democrats in congress would rather bow-down to these Islamic radicals before lifting a finger to fight them, as evidenced by their constant bashing of the president and their cut and run appeasement strategy of losing.

Democrats must never-ever be allowed to gain the presidency or leadership of either the House or Senate because their is no question they want to give this country's freedom away to the enemy, to fulfill their wet dreams of them not hating us.

To avoid this nightmare scenario, America and Republicans must fight the enemy with everything it has, both inside and outside the country.

© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.

|

As usual, we called it right long ago. Democrats Push Big Lie About War (Again)

Dems blew it bad, and they will pay by suffering their worse loss ever at the Polls. Joe Wilson and his stupid wife Valerie Plame should be indicted for false allegations and fraud, and be forced to pay retribution with all the money they've made off all their lies! Or better yet, just let Cheney take 'em out back for target practice.

End of an Affair The Washington Post

It follows that one of the most sensational charges leveled against the Bush White House -- that it orchestrated the leak of Ms. Plame's identity to ruin her career and thus punish Mr. Wilson -- is untrue. The partisan clamor that followed the raising of that allegation by Mr. Wilson in the summer of 2003 led to the appointment of a special prosecutor, a costly and prolonged investigation, and the indictment of Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, on charges of perjury.

Nevertheless, it now appears that the person most responsible for the end of Ms. Plame's CIA career is Mr. Wilson. Mr. Wilson chose to go public with an explosive charge, claiming -- falsely, as it turned out -- that he had debunked reports of Iraqi uranium-shopping in Niger and that his report had circulated to senior administration officials. He ought to have expected that both those officials and journalists such as Mr. Novak would ask why a retired ambassador would have been sent on such a mission and that the answer would point to his wife. He diverted responsibility from himself and his false charges by claiming that President Bush's closest aides had engaged in an illegal conspiracy. It's unfortunate that so many people took him seriously.

Emphasis mine.

Democrat's and their liberal puppets need to be crushed permanently into minority status. Hopefully this November will do the trick if Conservatives stop sucking up to democrats and start voting. The alternative of Nancy (Plastic) Pelosi leading the House and third in line to the presidency, will be the end of this nation, guaranteed! They simply will not defend national security.

Republicans need to get out the vote this November and save America from the whiney leftist appeasers who will get us all killed. The Islamic Facists' are just waiting for it!

© Copyright 2005-2008 The Creative Conservative, All Rights Reserved.

|